Moderators: Varanus, FM Game Moderators
ElusiveBelle wrote:alternative argument here is that you're saying uzay was safer but then why run the risk of sending them into a BG or being spotted by RT LO etc.
If we're talking n1, there was very little risk involved to any of them since I was outed. Making a safe play to have prankster do the kill over gf makes little sense when there is little danger and prankster although limited offers more utility than gf
ladd wrote:ElusiveBelle wrote:ladd wrote:just because eragon made those arguments it doesn't mean they don't make sense
again if uzay didn't do the nks, wtf was he doing?
from n3+ he def made the nks since he wa bombed but n1/n2 there is no pranks afaict
also on top of that janitor being out of charges implies they were stopped by Marshal at least once and with limited charges and janitor using two that likely means prankster was busy running marshal defense most of the game
elaborate?
ElusiveBelle wrote:ladd wrote:ElusiveBelle wrote:ladd wrote:just because eragon made those arguments it doesn't mean they don't make sense
again if uzay didn't do the nks, wtf was he doing?
from n3+ he def made the nks since he wa bombed but n1/n2 there is no pranks afaict
also on top of that janitor being out of charges implies they were stopped by Marshal at least once and with limited charges and janitor using two that likely means prankster was busy running marshal defense most of the game
elaborate?
janitor used 2 cleans which means they have one left or used that one against the marshal.
Not wanting to use up janitor charges it's very likely prankster was using their charges to block the marshal and insure kills
ElusiveBelle wrote:explain how bomb or witch is better n1?
They have no idea what ne or nk is in play?
Both run risk of exposing prankster immediately n1 which mitigates their use from the start.
Honestly pranking n1 is a terrible idea when you don't know what's in play. Maybe it would make more sense n2 onwards but not n1
ladd wrote:you are saying the gf/capo made the kill while the prankster did nothing
why the fuck would mafia play it like that?
the only possible arguments i can possibly see is have 3 people stack on murat buy that seems super risky if there is a LO (murat was a fairly high priority target for prot/LO imo)
ladd wrote:ElusiveBelle wrote:explain how bomb or witch is better n1?
They have no idea what ne or nk is in play?
Both run risk of exposing prankster immediately n1 which mitigates their use from the start.
Honestly pranking n1 is a terrible idea when you don't know what's in play. Maybe it would make more sense n2 onwards but not n1
it generates confusion
that's literally the best and only use of a prankster
or they could have used it as royee said to give a sp result to someone (which addimitdely we have no way of knowing since we lynched the sheriff d1)
ElusiveBelle wrote:ladd wrote:you are saying the gf/capo made the kill while the prankster did nothing
why the fuck would mafia play it like that?
the only possible arguments i can possibly see is have 3 people stack on murat buy that seems super risky if there is a LO (murat was a fairly high priority target for prot/LO imo)
No? Why would tp or lo be on anyone but me really no?
Granted glacial was on you which is questionable in and of itself especially as marshal and I'm claimed tk with a possible witch in play
ladd wrote:when have you seen the mafia holster the n1 prankster?
i bet there is almost no mafia team who would do that. they'd come up with all kind of dumb ideas for gambit but they would not holster
i feel like i am talking to a wall but anyway let's go over n1 again:
do you think prankster/janitor/gf(or capo) all visited murat n1?
if not, at worst MH/prankster are equally likely to have made the nk
ElusiveBelle wrote:ladd wrote:ElusiveBelle wrote:explain how bomb or witch is better n1?
They have no idea what ne or nk is in play?
Both run risk of exposing prankster immediately n1 which mitigates their use from the start.
Honestly pranking n1 is a terrible idea when you don't know what's in play. Maybe it would make more sense n2 onwards but not n1
it generates confusion
that's literally the best and only use of a prankster
or they could have used it as royee said to give a sp result to someone (which addimitdely we have no way of knowing since we lynched the sheriff d1)
Confusion that'll be settled very quickly once again mitigating their use.
The best use of prankster i can see is the big brain play as I've said to fake RBd then use prankster to fake RBs from the Klepto to make 2304 look like an escort and sell Eragon as clear
ElusiveBelle wrote:
But really I see no reason for mafia to prank n1 then also risk the prankster utility over GF when a sherif is already dead
ElusiveBelle wrote:I mean I've been said prankster before pretty sure.
But I can't remember specific games.
I've also used prankster n1 but usually in a grand over thought plot. So really prankster used n1 is of you have a plan to go with it for the long run not some easily countered half baked prank that'll reveal prankster exists without a capo in play
ElusiveBelle wrote:@chit
Just because I don't think it was officially asked.
Can klepto use a cleaned players action?
ladd wrote:k, then i am out for today
i have a busy day at work tmr so i don't really think i'll post much more (including tmr) for real this time
i have already wasted more of my weekend than i wanted on this game
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 61 guests