ChubbyMooshroom9 wrote:if you wanna die hosting have fun but yes it is a very fun game
ChubbyMooshroom9 wrote:if you wanna die hosting have fun but yes it is a very fun game
Multiuniverse wrote:ChubbyMooshroom9 wrote:if you wanna die hosting have fun but yes it is a very fun game
Also it's probably borderline impossible to host because you'll need to generate map, random resources, calculate how many spaces on the map units can move, calculate productivity etc and you'll also have to have the entire list of buildings that can be made and how much productivity you need for them not to mention natural wonders and the tech tree
And that's just the tip of the iceberg, you'll have to add ancient ruins for when you get the archaeologist tech and also do actions between players so they only see the area they have explored. You also have to manage negotiations between players and play as citystates and barbarians.
It'd also take a year or so to complete probably
dota2reporter wrote:probably with random civs if there are a lot of people because choosing would be too complicated
NheroArconix wrote:dota2reporter wrote:probably with random civs if there are a lot of people because choosing would be too complicated
http://civdrafter.com/civ5/#/form/playerCount
bam
Each player gets 3 civs to pick from, still randomly picked, no dupes
Ban venice because it's hilariously unplayable in multiplayer civ (Picking venice basically instantly loses you the game)
ChubbyMooshroom9 wrote:NheroArconix wrote:dota2reporter wrote:probably with random civs if there are a lot of people because choosing would be too complicated
http://civdrafter.com/civ5/#/form/playerCount
bam
Each player gets 3 civs to pick from, still randomly picked, no dupes
Ban venice because it's hilariously unplayable in multiplayer civ (Picking venice basically instantly loses you the game)
some of us are too poor for the dlc, nhero
NheroArconix wrote:dota2reporter wrote:probably with random civs if there are a lot of people because choosing would be too complicated
http://civdrafter.com/civ5/#/form/playerCount
bam
Each player gets 3 civs to pick from, still randomly picked, no dupes
Ban venice because it's hilariously unplayable in multiplayer civ (Picking venice basically instantly loses you the game)
ChubbyMooshroom9 wrote:NheroArconix wrote:dota2reporter wrote:probably with random civs if there are a lot of people because choosing would be too complicated
http://civdrafter.com/civ5/#/form/playerCount
bam
Each player gets 3 civs to pick from, still randomly picked, no dupes
Ban venice because it's hilariously unplayable in multiplayer civ (Picking venice basically instantly loses you the game)
some of us are too poor for the dlc, nhero
dota2reporter wrote:NheroArconix wrote:dota2reporter wrote:probably with random civs if there are a lot of people because choosing would be too complicated
http://civdrafter.com/civ5/#/form/playerCount
bam
Each player gets 3 civs to pick from, still randomly picked, no dupes
Ban venice because it's hilariously unplayable in multiplayer civ (Picking venice basically instantly loses you the game)
yeah thats what i was talking about
well ok i think its the best
i guess we should ban iroqui (idk how it's spelled in the english version), because they're also a joke tier civ
dota2reporter wrote:NheroArconix wrote:dota2reporter wrote:probably with random civs if there are a lot of people because choosing would be too complicated
http://civdrafter.com/civ5/#/form/playerCount
bam
Each player gets 3 civs to pick from, still randomly picked, no dupes
Ban venice because it's hilariously unplayable in multiplayer civ (Picking venice basically instantly loses you the game)
yeah thats what i was talking about
well ok i think its the best
i guess we should ban iroqui (idk how it's spelled in the english version), because they're also a joke tier civ
ChubbyMooshroom9 wrote:dota2reporter wrote:NheroArconix wrote:dota2reporter wrote:probably with random civs if there are a lot of people because choosing would be too complicated
http://civdrafter.com/civ5/#/form/playerCount
bam
Each player gets 3 civs to pick from, still randomly picked, no dupes
Ban venice because it's hilariously unplayable in multiplayer civ (Picking venice basically instantly loses you the game)
yeah thats what i was talking about
well ok i think its the best
i guess we should ban iroqui (idk how it's spelled in the english version), because they're also a joke tier civ
What Iroquois is fucking great
dota2reporter wrote:ChubbyMooshroom9 wrote:dota2reporter wrote:NheroArconix wrote:dota2reporter wrote:probably with random civs if there are a lot of people because choosing would be too complicated
http://civdrafter.com/civ5/#/form/playerCount
bam
Each player gets 3 civs to pick from, still randomly picked, no dupes
Ban venice because it's hilariously unplayable in multiplayer civ (Picking venice basically instantly loses you the game)
yeah thats what i was talking about
well ok i think its the best
i guess we should ban iroqui (idk how it's spelled in the english version), because they're also a joke tier civ
What Iroquois is fucking great
https://youtu.be/jhTdDH0VU5A?t=7614
ChubbyMooshroom9 wrote:With or without dlc
Nopingout wrote:Woah, I've never really been able to play a proper multiplayer Civ V game. i'll be interested!
Return to Off-Topic Discussions
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests