truffleshuffle03 wrote:What about this scenario? I am the WW and the witch finds me N2. I take out 2 of the 4 mafias and a town that night when the witch controls me. The game goes on for two more nights. Then the witch blurts out in chat I am the WW. They do not even claim a role when they do this so I automatically know they are the witch and I claim investigator and say they are the witch and is lying about me being the WW. Another town confirms it and not sure how but the lookout claims I did not visit the persons that died the night the WW attacked. SO we hang the witch and the witch could have won with me but tried to throw me up to be hung. I knew my time was numbered and the next full moon I got hung after killing two more people. The witch then claimed I was game throwing because I got them hung. I said you knew I was the WW since N2 yet you tried to get me hung and did not try and work with me you game threw not me. They then said well why didn't you whisper to me who you were. I was like I figured you had a brain it tells you, I'm, the WW and you win with either the WW or the mafia yet you tried to throw me under the bus when there was only 1 mafia left. They just got pissed and left the game saying they reported me. SO who was game throwing the WW or the Witch?
Witch could not win with the maf. There was only 1 mafia left on n3 when they tried to get me hung.Shilster wrote:truffleshuffle03 wrote:What about this scenario? I am the WW and the witch finds me N2. I take out 2 of the 4 mafias and a town that night when the witch controls me. The game goes on for two more nights. Then the witch blurts out in chat I am the WW. They do not even claim a role when they do this so I automatically know they are the witch and I claim investigator and say they are the witch and is lying about me being the WW. Another town confirms it and not sure how but the lookout claims I did not visit the persons that died the night the WW attacked. SO we hang the witch and the witch could have won with me but tried to throw me up to be hung. I knew my time was numbered and the next full moon I got hung after killing two more people. The witch then claimed I was game throwing because I got them hung. I said you knew I was the WW since N2 yet you tried to get me hung and did not try and work with me you game threw not me. They then said well why didn't you whisper to me who you were. I was like I figured you had a brain it tells you, I'm, the WW and you win with either the WW or the mafia yet you tried to throw me under the bus when there was only 1 mafia left. They just got pissed and left the game saying they reported me. SO who was game throwing the WW or the Witch?
No one. The Witch wanted to win with Mafia. Just a very bad play, assuming Town has majority.
truffleshuffle03 wrote:Witch could not win with the maf. There was only 1 mafia left on n3 when they tried to get me hung.Shilster wrote:truffleshuffle03 wrote:What about this scenario? I am the WW and the witch finds me N2. I take out 2 of the 4 mafias and a town that night when the witch controls me. The game goes on for two more nights. Then the witch blurts out in chat I am the WW. They do not even claim a role when they do this so I automatically know they are the witch and I claim investigator and say they are the witch and is lying about me being the WW. Another town confirms it and not sure how but the lookout claims I did not visit the persons that died the night the WW attacked. SO we hang the witch and the witch could have won with me but tried to throw me up to be hung. I knew my time was numbered and the next full moon I got hung after killing two more people. The witch then claimed I was game throwing because I got them hung. I said you knew I was the WW since N2 yet you tried to get me hung and did not try and work with me you game threw not me. They then said well why didn't you whisper to me who you were. I was like I figured you had a brain it tells you, I'm, the WW and you win with either the WW or the mafia yet you tried to throw me under the bus when there was only 1 mafia left. They just got pissed and left the game saying they reported me. SO who was game throwing the WW or the Witch?
No one. The Witch wanted to win with Mafia. Just a very bad play, assuming Town has majority.
truffleshuffle03 wrote:Witch could not win with the maf. There was only 1 mafia left on n3 when they tried to get me hung.Shilster wrote:truffleshuffle03 wrote:What about this scenario? I am the WW and the witch finds me N2. I take out 2 of the 4 mafias and a town that night when the witch controls me. The game goes on for two more nights. Then the witch blurts out in chat I am the WW. They do not even claim a role when they do this so I automatically know they are the witch and I claim investigator and say they are the witch and is lying about me being the WW. Another town confirms it and not sure how but the lookout claims I did not visit the persons that died the night the WW attacked. SO we hang the witch and the witch could have won with me but tried to throw me up to be hung. I knew my time was numbered and the next full moon I got hung after killing two more people. The witch then claimed I was game throwing because I got them hung. I said you knew I was the WW since N2 yet you tried to get me hung and did not try and work with me you game threw not me. They then said well why didn't you whisper to me who you were. I was like I figured you had a brain it tells you, I'm, the WW and you win with either the WW or the mafia yet you tried to throw me under the bus when there was only 1 mafia left. They just got pissed and left the game saying they reported me. SO who was game throwing the WW or the Witch?
No one. The Witch wanted to win with Mafia. Just a very bad play, assuming Town has majority.
cmitc1 wrote:This isn't gamethrowing.
if the escort has no way of winning with the town, looking after her OWN way of winning and siding with vamps is not game throwing.
Naru2008 wrote:As Gambit said. The Escort would have to roleblock until the game ended in a tie, or it's considered gamethrowing.
Joacgroso wrote:I feel like I went from Light Yagami to Keiichi Maebara.
TGambitG wrote:cmitc1 wrote:This isn't gamethrowing.
if the escort has no way of winning with the town, looking after her OWN way of winning and siding with vamps is not game throwing.
WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG... WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG.
Gamethrowing is not individual, it's your TEAM. Not your own. Gamethrowing is reducing your team's chances, not your own.
This has been said many times by the devs and mods, if you don't like it, tough. It's their game, their rules.
cmitc1 wrote:TGambitG wrote:cmitc1 wrote:This isn't gamethrowing.
if the escort has no way of winning with the town, looking after her OWN way of winning and siding with vamps is not game throwing.
WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG... WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG.
Gamethrowing is not individual, it's your TEAM. Not your own. Gamethrowing is reducing your team's chances, not your own.
This has been said many times by the devs and mods, if you don't like it, tough. It's their game, their rules.
but in this situation, your team can not win, so i dont see siding with vamps as gamethrowing.
Joacgroso wrote:I feel like I went from Light Yagami to Keiichi Maebara.
Joacgroso wrote:cmitc1 wrote:TGambitG wrote:cmitc1 wrote:This isn't gamethrowing.
if the escort has no way of winning with the town, looking after her OWN way of winning and siding with vamps is not game throwing.
WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG... WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG.
Gamethrowing is not individual, it's your TEAM. Not your own. Gamethrowing is reducing your team's chances, not your own.
This has been said many times by the devs and mods, if you don't like it, tough. It's their game, their rules.
but in this situation, your team can not win, so i dont see siding with vamps as gamethrowing.
They can't win, but they can draw.
Win>draw>loss
cmitc1 wrote:Joacgroso wrote:cmitc1 wrote:TGambitG wrote:cmitc1 wrote:This isn't gamethrowing.
if the escort has no way of winning with the town, looking after her OWN way of winning and siding with vamps is not game throwing.
WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG... WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG.
Gamethrowing is not individual, it's your TEAM. Not your own. Gamethrowing is reducing your team's chances, not your own.
This has been said many times by the devs and mods, if you don't like it, tough. It's their game, their rules.
but in this situation, your team can not win, so i dont see siding with vamps as gamethrowing.
They can't win, but they can draw.
Win>draw>loss
so either way they aren't winning, so why is it wrong to side with vamp?
Joacgroso wrote:I feel like I went from Light Yagami to Keiichi Maebara.
Mathelete wrote:Scenario: Escort vs vamp
Escort can draw the game if they rb, or they can win with vamps
If they win with vamps, are they gamethrowing by betraying their faction? Or would you say that roleblocking and drawing the game would be a gamethrow?
Joacgroso wrote:I feel like I went from Light Yagami to Keiichi Maebara.
JKEb wrote:Mathelete wrote:Scenario: Escort vs vamp
Escort can draw the game if they rb, or they can win with vamps
If they win with vamps, are they gamethrowing by betraying their faction? Or would you say that roleblocking and drawing the game would be a gamethrow?
I don't know if anyone has already said this, but I don't think it would be gamethrowing because you are switching teams. In order to gamethrow, you have to purposefully reduce your team's chance of winning. Once you are bit by the vampires, you are no longer part of the "town" team. By the logic of other people, anyone bit by a vampire would still be on the town team, therefore still having to try to make town win, which doesn't make sense.
Joacgroso wrote:Why are you still discussing this if a mod already gave his opinion.
Also, the escort IS gamethrowing because she refused to rb the vamp while she was an escort, so she gamethrew BEFORE becoming vampire.
Joacgroso wrote:Why are you still discussing this if a mod already gave his opinion.
Also, the escort IS gamethrowing because she refused to rb the vamp while she was an escort, so she gamethrew BEFORE becoming vampire.
Shilster wrote:Cirque wrote:Mathelete wrote:Cirque wrote:Unorthodox1337 wrote:If you are the escort, win with the vampires.
But that is gamethrowing.
This is why I hate Vampire. It's a win stealer and if you are in this situation you have to force a tie and you don't get a win because it would be gamethrowing if you went with the Vampires. sigh
I wouldn't worry about it much. Draw isn't so bad, it's better than a loss.
And if you have to choose between a win and a loss (the example with mayor, Vamp Hunter, and two vamps), go for the win. Most likely you will not be reported, as I would consider that to be justifiable gamethrowing.
Yes, but it still steals wins.
For example, I was Medium in All Any and I was about to win. But the last Vampire just HAD to bite me and die the same night, so I resulted in a loss. I hate Vampire.
But if they didn't bite they would be gamethrowing.
Joacgroso wrote:I feel like I went from Light Yagami to Keiichi Maebara.
Return to Town of Salem Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests