RetralMega wrote:BMG wont sue them because they're bigger than those degenerates are.
Yeah I'd actually be kinda pissed if they did that rather than focusing on the game. Just saying that they'd have a case if they did.
RetralMega wrote:BMG wont sue them because they're bigger than those degenerates are.
orangeandblack5 wrote:The game isn't F2P anymore, it's P2P.
JammySplodge wrote:The problem is that this thread won't stop complaints because most of the people complaining don't know how business works
RetralMega wrote:JammySplodge wrote:The problem is that this thread won't stop complaints because most of the people complaining don't know how business works
Or how a forum works.
They're children.
They just want to bitch and moan and assume it'll be changed because everything else in life has been handed to them, so why not this?
SiakAttack wrote:Just had a look at Tormentals video and wow does he show bias, not only does he only show half the facts, nitpicks Achilles' posts to suit him and try to press an opinion on his viewers with this...
He also gives a mini rant about being banned for "disagreeing with BMG" not seen any proof of this so far, my guess is he did something and doesn't want to admit it to his viewers
Stinko wrote:Okay then you agree it's not being fulfilled. So people could try for their funding back since stuff hasn't been fulfilled like I said and it would be a bad idea for blank media to start going to court when anyone out there could have a case against them.
randomguyhavingfun wrote:I'm not supporting either side but don't tell me that a forumers YouTube activities ( if it's not him showing a violation of the rules in game ) getting someone banned is justified! This is outrageous. Not taking criticism is just childish.
MrNSAagent wrote:Oh sure, I understood from the start that the money had to come from SOMEWHERE. And yes, the Town Points only bought cosmetics. That's all they did and that's all they'll ever do.
But I still hate Merit Points. I have thought about it for a few moments (like SOME PEOPLE should) and my opinion is just the same as my original on the Patch Notes.
And I will keep saying this:
Can there PLEASE be a way to convert Merit Points to Town Points?! Make it, like, 1000 MP = 10 TP. Some of us just don't have money.
mdb1023 wrote:Stinko wrote:Okay then you agree it's not being fulfilled. So people could try for their funding back since stuff hasn't been fulfilled like I said and it would be a bad idea for blank media to start going to court when anyone out there could have a case against them.
Again, not saying they should go to court. But here's the thing: you can't sue someone over a single Kickstarter goal when everything else was fulfilled, and Psn is eventually going to be made. But you CAN sue someone for defamation, which is what Tormental is doing. The dictionary definition of defamation is: "the act of saying false things in order to make people have a bad opinion of someone or something : the act of defaming someone or something"
It's one thing to quit the game over a bad experience and tell your audience about it. It's another thing to CONTINUE making these videos about it and show incorrect facts to give the company a bad name MONTHS after the incident occurred. Saying false things like "they ban people for having a different opinion" and showing out of context Facebook photos of the developers to give the company a bad name is defamation. Now, I'm not a lawyer and I don't claim to be one, but I know a thing or two about the law. Again, NOT SAYING THAT BMG SHOULD SUE, just that they would have a case.
Magnasword2 wrote:mdb1023 wrote:Stinko wrote:Okay then you agree it's not being fulfilled. So people could try for their funding back since stuff hasn't been fulfilled like I said and it would be a bad idea for blank media to start going to court when anyone out there could have a case against them.
Again, not saying they should go to court. But here's the thing: you can't sue someone over a single Kickstarter goal when everything else was fulfilled, and Psn is eventually going to be made. But you CAN sue someone for defamation, which is what Tormental is doing. The dictionary definition of defamation is: "the act of saying false things in order to make people have a bad opinion of someone or something : the act of defaming someone or something"
It's one thing to quit the game over a bad experience and tell your audience about it. It's another thing to CONTINUE making these videos about it and show incorrect facts to give the company a bad name MONTHS after the incident occurred. Saying false things like "they ban people for having a different opinion" and showing out of context Facebook photos of the developers to give the company a bad name is defamation. Now, I'm not a lawyer and I don't claim to be one, but I know a thing or two about the law. Again, NOT SAYING THAT BMG SHOULD SUE, just that they would have a case.
If you have a wound and you put a band aid on it, Then 6 months later the bandaid gets pulled off (Like with Achilles comments on a previous thread) Would you not look for a new band aid?
mdb1023 wrote:Stinko wrote:Okay then you agree it's not being fulfilled. So people could try for their funding back since stuff hasn't been fulfilled like I said and it would be a bad idea for blank media to start going to court when anyone out there could have a case against them.
Again, not saying they should go to court. But here's the thing: you can't sue someone over a single Kickstarter goal when everything else was fulfilled, and Psn is eventually going to be made. But you CAN sue someone for defamation, which is what Tormental is doing. The dictionary definition of defamation is: "the act of saying false things in order to make people have a bad opinion of someone or something : the act of defaming someone or something"
It's one thing to quit the game over a bad experience and tell your audience about it. It's another thing to CONTINUE making these videos about it and show incorrect facts to give the company a bad name MONTHS after the incident occurred. Saying false things like "they ban people for having a different opinion" and showing out of context Facebook photos of the developers to give the company a bad name is defamation. Now, I'm not a lawyer and I don't claim to be one, but I know a thing or two about the law. Again, NOT SAYING THAT BMG SHOULD SUE, just that they would have a case.
fornycation wrote:mdb1023 wrote:Stinko wrote:Okay then you agree it's not being fulfilled. So people could try for their funding back since stuff hasn't been fulfilled like I said and it would be a bad idea for blank media to start going to court when anyone out there could have a case against them.
Again, not saying they should go to court. But here's the thing: you can't sue someone over a single Kickstarter goal when everything else was fulfilled, and Psn is eventually going to be made. But you CAN sue someone for defamation, which is what Tormental is doing. The dictionary definition of defamation is: "the act of saying false things in order to make people have a bad opinion of someone or something : the act of defaming someone or something"
It's one thing to quit the game over a bad experience and tell your audience about it. It's another thing to CONTINUE making these videos about it and show incorrect facts to give the company a bad name MONTHS after the incident occurred. Saying false things like "they ban people for having a different opinion" and showing out of context Facebook photos of the developers to give the company a bad name is defamation. Now, I'm not a lawyer and I don't claim to be one, but I know a thing or two about the law. Again, NOT SAYING THAT BMG SHOULD SUE, just that they would have a case.
The case would be borderline at best. I'm taking some business law courses at school and it's much harder for a company to prove defamation than it is for an individual. In order to prove defamation BMG needs show two things, 1. What was said about them was 100% false and 2. The statement that was said caused serious harm to their business/reputation. For number 1, BMG could probably prove the statements were false but in order to win in court there needs to be no doubt about it and I would argue that most of the statements by Tormental/YouTubers have some truth to them. For number 2, BMG would have a hard time proving serious harm to their reputation or business. If you take Tormental for example, he's not speaking to millions and millions of people and BMG would have no way of proving the loss of business was due to him or a variety of other reasons. Like I said at the start for an individual it's easy to claim serious harm because you could get fired from your job or end up in jail but for a business it's awfully hard to win a defamation case without solid evidence.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests