JesuChristi666 wrote:James I don't get why that is such a big deal in the first place.
He just does not want to admit the Crusades was over land and not over G-d.
Ask a Catholic
Re: Ask a Catholic
by NDM » Tue Nov 28, 2017 7:11 pm
He just does not want to admit the Crusades was over land and not over G-d.
Spoiler:
Anyone who thinks they can debate me without evidence cannot win a debate. Anyone who just uses one quote as a point shows they are the failure, and prove the opposing side.
I suck at grammar. I admit it. Grammar is my lowest subject, compared to my math, reading, writing, science and history.
Anyone who thinks they can debate me without evidence cannot win a debate. Anyone who just uses one quote as a point shows they are the failure, and prove the opposing side.
I suck at grammar. I admit it. Grammar is my lowest subject, compared to my math, reading, writing, science and history.
-
NDM - Godfather
- Posts: 1881
- Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2015 7:29 am
- Location: Hell, Norway
Re: Ask a Catholic
by James2 » Tue Nov 28, 2017 7:54 pm
JesuChristi666 wrote:James I don't get why that is such a big deal in the first place.
Because the narrative spread by people like NDM (or you) is a lie. More specifically, it's a lie told to delegitimize Christendom.
- James2
- Godfather
- Posts: 1555
- Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 9:53 am
Re: Ask a Catholic
by NDM » Tue Nov 28, 2017 7:57 pm
James2 wrote:JesuChristi666 wrote:James I don't get why that is such a big deal in the first place.
Because the narrative spread by people like NDM (or you) is a lie. More specifically, it's a lie told to delegitimize Christendom.
No it is facts proven by history. The Crusades were for land, as Persians, Abasids, and more held Israel before and after Rome.
Spoiler:
Anyone who thinks they can debate me without evidence cannot win a debate. Anyone who just uses one quote as a point shows they are the failure, and prove the opposing side.
I suck at grammar. I admit it. Grammar is my lowest subject, compared to my math, reading, writing, science and history.
Anyone who thinks they can debate me without evidence cannot win a debate. Anyone who just uses one quote as a point shows they are the failure, and prove the opposing side.
I suck at grammar. I admit it. Grammar is my lowest subject, compared to my math, reading, writing, science and history.
-
NDM - Godfather
- Posts: 1881
- Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2015 7:29 am
- Location: Hell, Norway
Re: Ask a Catholic
by Wirewolf » Sun Dec 03, 2017 8:37 am
NDM wrote:James2 wrote:JesuChristi666 wrote:James I don't get why that is such a big deal in the first place.
Because the narrative spread by people like NDM (or you) is a lie. More specifically, it's a lie told to delegitimize Christendom.
No it is facts proven by history. The Crusades were for land, as Persians, Abasids, and more held Israel before and after Rome.
Speaking historically it was a mixture of factors. Undoubtedly, for some of the leadership it was for land, though they weren’t a majority by any means (arguably, not even within the leadership, never mind the crusaders as a whole). The Pope’s inner motivations were probably more to stem conflict amongst Catholic nations by giving them a common enemy and cause. For the average crusader/peasant they likely genuinely believed it was a religious mission from God to retake the Holy Land.
- Wirewolf
- Bodyguard
- Posts: 232
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 10:40 am
Return to Off-Topic Discussions
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests