LOLingHyena wrote:Jalandh wrote:LOLingHyena wrote:Jalandh wrote:LOLingHyena wrote:non271103 wrote:/vote guilty Eragon
/vote guilty Jal
/vote guilty Ph0ne
/vote guilty Multi
Now sheep me.
This is genuinely towny.
.
Garbage reaction to a garbage post. What even is this
Okay, how tf is that a garbage post, Jal. Tell me in your own words.
Because non is better then trying to Lynch a 0poster and asking others to sheep on them.
Eragon has been towny, I want reason for the vote there.
Multi I can see being town who didn't read, give me more reason.
Phone I'm actually alright with.
As a recap, that's 3/4 votes that need explaining. Yet, they were naked votes. And you praise and call it towny? What are your stances in the 4 people, and explain why.
I praise it for being towny because it puts pressure on all those people, and I think it also makes a statement that from now on, people should be more careful about putting people on trial. I don't care who the votes were on. Other people could have been put on trial, and if Non had voted all of them, it would still be towny.
As for Phone, he's been towny to me due to the interactions with Chemist. Of the four people voted, that's the read I feel most comfortable with. I don't know why you're so quick to read Eragon town. I don't think Eragon is THAT easy to read within the first 24 hours.
Right now, it feels to me that you're panicking that someone put a vote for you, which I think is a huge overreaction considering 8 guilties are needed to lynch someone. You need to chill out, bro.
Oof the pressure, whatever shall I do? Look, if it was actually pressure, then sure fine, whatever. But that's not pressure, that's just dropping votes and acting like you're participating. It's not Wolfy RN but it's garbage, pure garbage.
I've been in plenty of games with Eragon. I feel confident in my ability to read him, as shown in the latest vfm and other games. When he's town, I can see him being town. When he's not, I don't live long.
Did I ever mention him voting me? The closest thing I said was he voted a 0 poster. AMD you can't argue that it's a bad thing to do, because either he pulls back the vote, making it empty and waste of a post, try to give nonexistent reasoning for the vote, or claim I'm acting scummy and stick to it. But he would have still wasted the initial post to do that third one if that's what he goes with.