RHawkeye wrote:roz1roz wrote:Let me rephrase it.
Out of your 40 posts, there are 11 questions for people to explain theirs sentences or about theirs opinion.
It would be really cool if you had a bit actual opinions on your own as well. But most of your posts are... let's call it facts, they are something wich is truth, some explaining, some statements wich people believe in, like "We are lynching", "Trying to dictate PR actions even hypothetically is a bad idea", "Nolynching gives us no info", "I don't like being misrepresented".
But they... don't really relate to game in any AI way.
Honestly, this is kinda gross.
Like, yeah, I've stated a lot of obvious shit, because it turned out that stuff wasn't so obvious to the newer players in the game. Surely it would be weirder if I, an experienced player, stood by and ignored it while they were suggesting taking actions detrimental to town?
roz1roz wrote:Only opinions your ISO have is stuff like... calling something fake and not give any reasoning. Saying you would think of voting M4xwell and not give any reasoning.
That's pretty bad from the person who is trying to ask others to explain everything, to not give any reasoning themself.
So yeah, let me ask again here. Why are you asking people for reasonings if you usually avoid to give your own to begin with.
I'm asking people for their opinions/explanations so I can try figure out the motivations behind certain things they're saying. Figuring out motivations makes it easier to figure out alignments.
It's disingenuous to suggest that I'm avoiding giving reasons. I explained quite clearly why I voted soulshade when the reason was misinterpreted. I explained why I thought kosmo's post about starting to focus on winning was wolfy. I'm not sure how you expect me to explain why I thought a post felt fake, I think it's fairly self explanatory.
Sometimes, I think, it can be beneficial to not immediately give reasoning. Like with your naked vote on me, we got to see how plenty of people reacted to that. People might draw their own conclusions, might state assumptions, and again that helps discern motivations. I don't think I've been asked to explain anything and ignored it.
Yeah, exactly. You explained when you was misinterpreted, not earlier.
And while I agree that sometimes there is a reason to not instantly give reasoning, I also think that you are leaving some statements unjustified too often.
It's kinda like going AMA.
Don't expect waiting to be asked to explain is a good way, cause it's not. If you have a case on someone, use it.
As for first quote - yea, but that's still not content. Stating obvious stuff can be also made by mafia, trying to get more posts.
Do you see where I'm coming from?
I don't say it's very AI, as it's day 1, and most people didn't bother yet, but still...
You are trying and not trying in the same time and it's bothering me.