TalkingDirty wrote:UNDERSTOOD12345 wrote:I mean if your gonna vote me to force me to work fine, but that's like sketchy tactics
You mean you won't contribute unless you are voted?
I mean, I will contribute, this just gives me extra motivation
Moderators: Varanus, FM Game Moderators
TalkingDirty wrote:UNDERSTOOD12345 wrote:I mean if your gonna vote me to force me to work fine, but that's like sketchy tactics
You mean you won't contribute unless you are voted?
TalkingDirty wrote:UNDERSTOOD12345 wrote:TalkingDirty wrote:UNDERSTOOD12345 wrote:I mean if your gonna vote me to force me to work fine, but that's like sketchy tactics
You mean you won't contribute unless you are voted?
I mean, I will contribute, this just gives me extra motivation
So you think it's scummy for people to vote you because of your inactivity. But, I gotta be honest, you don't seem to be inactive in the sense that you are not on. You currently have 43 posts. Snap has 38 posts and they have contributed more, and they are on the chopping block just as much as you are. Therefore, you are active you just aren't contributing enough in your posts. But then you say you won't be more productive until you are voted; gives you more motivation. It's all very weird to me. Why do you need votes on you to be more active? Why not just put more work into your posts?
TalkingDirty wrote:ShortcutButton wrote:I disagree that naked votes are taboo. They simply represent someone's viewpoints that they don't want to share just yet. Not necessarily scummy
I was never intentionally defending ici. In fact I think the only time I've talked about him was in reference to how good at this game we both are. Can you point to when ici fingered me?
I don't understand the question. Where were you fingered?
xUltiix wrote:2 about me pointing out a Cit) Because thats what I saw him as ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Player | Votes | Voters |
---|---|---|
# | Votes Until Majority |
UNDERSTOOD12345 wrote:I mean if your gonna vote me to force me to work fine, but that's like sketchy tactics
OllyRenard wrote:I want Awesome or Talk Dirty lynched now. Purple is best girl. Harper is meh girl. Short is gross girl. Thank god I'm vig
@Understood where is the meta analysis of andilin you promised, u scum?
/vote awesome
snapshot112 wrote:can anyone give me an actual reason to be voting me? I higly dislike the fact that I've got 5 votes on me based on pretty much nothing.
PurpleSidewalk1 wrote: Spoiler:OllyRenard wrote:I want Awesome or Talk Dirty lynched now. Purple is best girl. Harper is meh girl. Short is gross girl. Thank god I'm vig
@Understood where is the meta analysis of andilin you promised, u scum?
/vote awesome
Fuck you! I wanted to vote awesome, but I don't know... hmmmmm okay fine but I'm not with Olly. Actually maybe not actually idk.snapshot112 wrote:can anyone give me an actual reason to be voting me? I higly dislike the fact that I've got 5 votes on me based on pretty much nothing.
You are bad. I've got a different playstyle than you. Sorry, not sorry.
Also your push on Ult was so stupid it had to be scum motivated. He could have missed Ici say it was a reaction test as both scum or town and could have ignored it as both as well. That was pretty much your whole argument so ye. If someone says something that they know isn't true then it's generally a good scumtell. I hadn't really tought of the possibility of him not having read the post since they weren't far apart. that would indeed explain it.
You've been whiteknighting, If I have been whiteknighting then so has harper. Luckily, I haven't been doing so. Someone was being accused based on shitty reasoning. I asked them to explain the reasoning and when they didn't bring up anything good, I made a compareable reasoning as to why ichi would be scum. using the same logic that he used to call andilin scum. This to show him how bad his argument actually was. That was me defending andilin and showing ichi why he was wrong to scumread andilin for it. That's what every townie should do when someone is accused for shitty reasoning. I have no regrets and would do it again.
And even if that was whiteknighting, (wich it wasn't!) then you would still be hypocriticall for calling me out on it since you are doing the exact same thing with ultiix.
inflexible in reads, I have barely done any reads. and we only have 24 pages of discussion. Not really a lot to go off. Not to mention that you have been calling me scum since you started posting. wich isn't showing a lot of flexibility either.
and just pinging me in general. Sometimes someone plays differently than you, deal with it.
All that being said I want to move on from you because I think there are some more reactionary targets, but I need you to give me a reason to move on. TL;DR: The only good argument you brought up is the second one saying that I called xUltiix out for saying something wich was obviously false. sad thing is that you had to put a sticker on it saying: This can't possibly be anything but Scum!motivated. wich kind of ruins it. argument 1 and 5 are shit, and argument 3 and 4 are false and hypocritical. When you get to the point that you have to make up arguments to depict someone as scum, you know that it's time to take off your tunnel goggles and look somewhere else.
ShortcutButton wrote:@michael is this plurality or majority?
UNDERSTOOD12345 wrote:Also, a fairly decent wolftell is Snapshot asking why people are voting him as a defense. It's weird to say that people are voting him ove rnothing, it's like he's trying to subtly push us off. Besides that, he's not as defensive as I would expect in this moment as well
Enxtra wrote:/vote Snapshot
UNDERSTOOD12345 wrote: I think snap is not quite as confident as he is when he is town, so I could go for a snap lynch too.
/vote Snapshot
Anonymous0726 wrote:Not sure why I haven't done this yet, but
/vote snapshot112
QuantumRadius wrote:snapshot112 wrote:actually, you don't even have to agree. Just keep in mind that he was called scum and voted for based on nothing. Wich is pretty much equal to random accusing someone.
so this is not a weird post. It's perfectly fine.
where do i begin
first line basically looks like a scum asserting themselves confidently as town
second line is a really weak defense on andilin, discrediting the push but not supporting andilin, could be scum distancing from a defense
last line is absolutely shit
/vote snapshot
MaccaMania wrote:/vote Snapshot
I'm more confident on Snap being scum over Andi rn because despite both of them having equally scummy posts and weird interactions I could see Mafia!Snap whiteknighting Andilin bc he knows Andi is town and wants to buddy with him or smth like that. It made sense in my head.
UNDERSTOOD12345 wrote:Why aren't you defensive Snap?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 86 guests