Town of Salem Game Forums

pageget

Swords, you're starting to sound like 7I ._.

I do, Swords. But it's rather hard to psychoanalyze you - or hell, rattle you - if you won't humor me here.

Nah Neasans 7I was more flailing with lame excuses

I'm actually on to something here.

Cyantic, why would I want to be rattled? There are maracas on the back table.

Swordsworth wrote:Nah Neasans 7I was more flailing with lame excuses

I'm actually on to something here.

Cyantic, why would I want to be rattled? There are maracas on the back table.

Quaint. I bring up my previous question, Swords.

I already told you, I have a set of strong reads already.

On the incredible 4 people who have posted more than once.

/sob

Swordsworth wrote:I already told you, I have a set of strong reads already.

On the incredible 4 people who have posted more than once.

/sob

Improbable, Swords. Very improbable.

I would deduce that all four are somehow strong town reads - Met, Neasans, Retral, and I, otherwise you would be pushing on them. However, do you see anything alignment telling in Met? Unless you rule deliberately cautious/oblivious as town. And yet, abnormally risky of an assumption on Met/Neasans considering your play so far in this game.

I would, in fact, deduce that you're at least bluffing one two players of the four. So, Swords, I bring myself back to the original question. Maybe liven it up a bit and ask what you're seeing in them that I'm not.

Cyantic wrote:

Metrion wrote:"I find his [extremely bad, unpleasant, degrading] silence to be most discomforting, don't you?"

I mean, awesome implications are cool and redundant, don't forget redundant either.


TheCow hasn't said anything, and I don't find it awkward yet so; no. Do you believe your opinion is that of the majority or more outlier? Perhaps neither? Maybe you're playing the part of the provoker, either way I haven't been scum reading you on the first page, so progress I suppose.

I would have to say that I think you're wrong. My choice of adjectives is perfect for getting my unique flair across, Met. Redundancy is irrelevant, of course. If I wanted to spend time on making it simple, then I'd just be a regular old sensible player, and who wants that?

I believe that my opinion should be of the majority, but not necessarily the major opinion of the town here. I enjoy being the provoker and the snarker very much, Met.

That's objective, I'll have you know. And I find the theatrics unhelpful.


So you're saying it should be the major opinion of scum, alright.

Neasans wrote:mfw haven't spent two minutes in this game and there's already weird shit happening to me

Okay, so. Some random weenie sent me an anonymous message claiming to be grey and asking me if I was green or red. I'm assuming they're scum because that seems fishy as fuck.

So there's apparently some "grey" person out there. No idea what that means, but they're already pretty much claiming not to be green. I did not respond to the message.

Green = Town
Red = Scum
Grey = Neutral

So it was like blackmailer then, Chief? Given that you could reply back. Swords, any input on that?

We have a neutral/mafia blackmailer in the game, I see no reason for you to lie about that.

RetralMega wrote:Oh, it was in a spoiler. I was high as fuck. XD I'm Hades and I can make people die a phase later. So yeah. I'm claiming because of my passive being awesome.

Sounds OP, Hades is a pretty rocking claim too.

More importantly are you just liberal with your role cards or do you not understand that it's best to keep those bits squared away from everyone else?

TheCow wrote:/vote swords

Cow always gets the meme.

Met, I was deliberately fucking with you because it was a joke. That much should've been clear when I switched my vote from Cow to Retral. :roll:

Okay Cow, you have fun with that.

Met, I'm not making any immediate assumptions about roles. I'd really rather not, given the liberties you can take with closed TFM.

Cyantic, I'm not you.

Swordsworth wrote:Cyantic, I'm not you.

Cyantic wrote:otherwise you would be pushing on them.

Professor Oak's words echo:

"Cyantic! There's a time and place for everything! But not now."

Cyantic wrote:Met, I was deliberately fucking with you because it was a joke. That much should've been clear when I switched my vote from Cow to Retral.

So it was all for nothing, just to look like you were doing stuff. Awesome.

Swordsworth wrote:Okay Cow, you have fun with that.

Met, I'm not making any immediate assumptions about roles. I'd really rather not, given the liberties you can take with closed TFM.

Cyantic, I'm not you.

The joke:

swordsworth something something always scum / are lynched when a blackmailer something something is in the game.



Anyway, you're right: assumptions can make asses out of people. But I do think it's safe to say there is some sort of communication role like Blackmailer.

Metrion wrote:

Cyantic wrote:Met, I was deliberately fucking with you because it was a joke. That much should've been clear when I switched my vote from Cow to Retral. :roll:

So it was all for nothing, just to look like you were doing stuff. Awesome.

A ruse, Metrion? I'll have to pass this time.


Swords - I'm operating on a basic scale of assumptions. One is that if you've found scum, you're going to push them. There's no point in letting them sit around for a while when you can clearly operate on them now. There's a few reasons why you would abstain from doing this, but I'm not seeing the reasoning to do so.

Metrion wrote:

Cyantic wrote:Met, I was deliberately fucking with you because it was a joke. That much should've been clear when I switched my vote from Cow to Retral.

So it was all for nothing, just to look like you were doing stuff. Awesome.

Swordsworth wrote:Okay Cow, you have fun with that.

Met, I'm not making any immediate assumptions about roles. I'd really rather not, given the liberties you can take with closed TFM.

Cyantic, I'm not you.

The joke:

swordsworth something something always scum / are lynched when a blackmailer something something is in the game.



Anyway, you're right: assumptions can make asses out of people. But I do think it's safe to say there is some sort of communication role like Blackmailer.

The day when my meta of being scum when I'm blackmailed is broken should have been when Cow mislynched me in NFM3. [aaaaa commences]



So I just wrote this giant thing on theorization and then I realized my point was invalid.

Cyantic wrote:Swords - I'm operating on a basic scale of assumptions. One is that if you've found scum, you're going to push them. There's no point in letting them sit around for a while when you can clearly operate on them now. There's a few reasons why you would abstain from doing this, but I'm not seeing the reasoning to do so.

Throw your assumptions out the window. All we know is that there's 9 players with a town majority that allows for 1 mislynch minimum, ruling 3 mafia and 1 neutral as the maximum barrier for scum.

Swordsworth wrote:

Cyantic wrote:Swords - I'm operating on a basic scale of assumptions. One is that if you've found scum, you're going to push them. There's no point in letting them sit around for a while when you can clearly operate on them now. There's a few reasons why you would abstain from doing this, but I'm not seeing the reasoning to do so.

Throw your assumptions out the window. All we know is that there's 9 players with a town majority that allows for 1 mislynch minimum, ruling 3 mafia and 1 neutral as the maximum barrier for scum.

I'm not talking about fundamentals about a game, Swords. Try putting it into context.

Game specifically referencing the make up of this one.

I can contextualize it easily and tell you, yet again, to toss the toolbox to the tornado. That thinking will only go so far, and how far it goes is increasingly nullified by a closed TFM setup. I could be pushing a lynch in order to gain immunity from it, just as an example.

I'm being a little dramatic, aren't I? The inner workings of TFM14 just gives me a healthy respect for possible crazy.

I want to hear more from Elastoid, Deferent, and Cow.

Yeah, I had the option to respond.

Not sure what to think of Retral and his claim. He seems non-chalant about the whole thing, then again it goes on a similar vein as to what he did in 8E, so I'm not sure as to what conclusion to draw.

wait did you just imply you could be some sort of warlock???

Swordsworth wrote:just as an example.

._.

oh