Town of Salem Game Forums

Neasans wrote:Also about saying I haven't addressed anyone you should take into consideration that I'm simply not comfortable with really doing much when not in my comfort environment of being rested + laptop so fite me until I get those two

Elastoid wrote:K this is my last break before I go home so last "initial impression" before I really get into this -- what the hell is going on with Met?

Is he just really swamped (he did delay his other game)? I'm troubled that his few posts managed to only barely skirt relevance. Just vaguely pro-Retral and anti-Cyantic, then he disappears.

Again, maybe my second look will be different, but I'm going to be looking very hard at Retral, Neasans and Met.

Def, if you can show Von trying to push some sort of scum agenda rather than just being an idiot, that'd be helpful.

TheCow wrote:

Cyantic wrote:Von royally flipping the fuck out. Okay. Also, what's this about calming down? I think I need to liven it up again. /insane

Von's... defense reminds me of Arc. Bad.

Arc where?

Metrion wrote:

Swordsworth wrote:Must fight the urge....to use AoM flavour.....*dies*

Von, is that everything you know on your card?

Let the fishing begin so he can better claim Cit himself.

Neasans wrote:

Cyantic wrote:

Cyantic wrote:/vote TheCow

Seems like a guy I'd trust with weaponry.

/vote TheCow

zzz

where is that quote from

and yes i intend to quote 99% of the thread

might have to break this up into multiple posts so that people don't die from trying to read 10-page-long walls

Neasans wrote:

Cyantic wrote:

Metrion wrote:Was not aware 7 + 3 = 9.

;)

Call me Fraction Jackson, Met.

i can only assume this is a meme i don't get and i'm too lazy to google so pls explain

Neasans wrote:

Cyantic wrote:Also, 2/1 is the ratio of votes on Cow versus the votes not on Cow we should be striving for.

still no idea where that number comes from

also p sure ratios are done with the : symbol? Like it'd be 2:1 in that case? though what do I know about life

Neasans wrote:

Cyantic wrote:

Metrion wrote:"I find his [extremely bad, unpleasant, degrading] silence to be most discomforting, don't you?"

I mean, awesome implications are cool and redundant, don't forget redundant either.


TheCow hasn't said anything, and I don't find it awkward yet so; no. Do you believe your opinion is that of the majority or more outlier? Perhaps neither? Maybe you're playing the part of the provoker, either way I haven't been scum reading you on the first page, so progress I suppose.

I would have to say that I think you're wrong. My choice of adjectives is perfect for getting my unique flair across, Met. Redundancy is irrelevant, of course. If I wanted to spend time on making it simple, then I'd just be a regular old sensible player, and who wants that?

I believe that my opinion should be of the majority, but not necessarily the major opinion of the town here. I enjoy being the provoker and the snarker very much, Met.

this verbal flair of yours is sketched more dramatically than your avatar, I'll give you that

Why do you believe it should be the opinion of the majority but not necessarily the major opinion? i am confuse

Neasans wrote:

Cyantic wrote:/unvote
/vote RetralMega

If my seriousness was ever in doubt about Cow.

Any particular reason for the change of vote or was it your intent on Cow standing?

Neasans wrote:

Cyantic wrote:

Swordsworth wrote:All in good time. Right now, I'd like to know what Elastoid is thinking.

Heh. You pretend that the motivations aren't clear enough.

You're asking at Elastoid since he's posted but not actually posted. Specifically, you're trying to get a feel for Elastoid over a more stable read for Met. Would I be incorrect on this?

that's not pretending, the motivations aren't clear enough :roll:

correct or incorrect, I wonder how you draw this conclusion?

Neasans wrote:

Cyantic wrote:

Swordsworth wrote:That's neither here nor there.

So, I'm either right or I'm very close to right. Thanks.

Why prefer a more general spread of reads over getting a few good reads early on?

and you conclude he prefers so because?

also you two have conversations that look way to complex for me to fully understand

Neasans wrote:

Cyantic wrote:

Swordsworth wrote:Nah Neasans 7I was more flailing with lame excuses

I'm actually on to something here.

Cyantic, why would I want to be rattled? There are maracas on the back table.

Quaint. I bring up my previous question, Swords.

what is "quaint"

i don't speak flamboyant english

Neasans wrote:

Cyantic wrote:

Swordsworth wrote:I already told you, I have a set of strong reads already.

On the incredible 4 people who have posted more than once.

/sob

Improbable, Swords. Very improbable.

I would deduce that all four are somehow strong town reads - Met, Neasans, Retral, and I, otherwise you would be pushing on them. However, do you see anything alignment telling in Met? Unless you rule deliberately cautious/oblivious as town. And yet, abnormally risky of an assumption on Met/Neasans considering your play so far in this game.

I would, in fact, deduce that you're at least bluffing one two players of the four. So, Swords, I bring myself back to the original question. Maybe liven it up a bit and ask what you're seeing in them that I'm not.

you seem to be making more assumptions than what you claim he is assuming so I would like to hear your thought process on this

Cyantic wrote:War of Titans? More like War of Walls if ya know what I'm sayin'

Neasans wrote:

Cyantic wrote:War of Titans? More like War of Walls if ya know what I'm sayin'

And, interestingly enough, none of the walls in these game are yours. Quite the curiosity, if you ask me.

Neasans wrote:Riddle me this if you want a last shot at me ever thinking you could be green - How will you explain your bullshit when you see I am town?

Neasans wrote:Also, not sure about Met since he's been somewhat bland this game, but Von is a Town-read for me at the moment.

Neasans wrote:*points to huge post no one is reading*