Moderators: Varanus, FM Game Moderators
Alzar wrote:there is no such thing as a meta, forum mafia is a lie, we are products of a confused society
pretzellover33 wrote:TheCow wrote:pretzellover33 wrote:I investigated Salense because of the interactions between him and Ayanhart.
Best "lead" I had for that day.
What interactions?
"(party)"
"(ytrap)"
"NOOOOO ;____;"
" "
TheCow wrote:Pretzel, what do those mean to you?
TheCow wrote:You had no suspects at ALL after D1, Cway?
Unvote Aqua
Coolway99 wrote:TheCow wrote:You had no suspects at ALL after D1, Cway?
:/ I tend to ignore Day 1, as it's pretty much all spam
But no, I had suspects, I just decided to invest pret
pretzellover33 wrote:Sturps how is it a contradiction.
It's as if you know salense is 100% framer.
Sturps wrote:pretzellover33 wrote:Sturps how is it a contradiction.
It's as if you know salense is 100% framer.
You said you didn't find any confirmed Mafia members, yet you claim Salense was framed or is a Framer.
Why didn't you mention you found a potential Mafia member instead of saying 'no confirmed Mafia'?
pretzellover33 wrote:Sturps wrote:pretzellover33 wrote:Sturps how is it a contradiction.
It's as if you know salense is 100% framer.
You said you didn't find any confirmed Mafia members, yet you claim Salense was framed or is a Framer.
Why didn't you mention you found a potential Mafia member instead of saying 'no confirmed Mafia'?
As I said before:
I was pretty sure he was framed and decided that I should probably wait and investigate again.
Sturps wrote:Did you publicly claim that you were going to wait and investigate again?
pretzellover33 wrote:Sturps how is it a contradiction.
It's as if you know salense is 100% framer.
Sturps wrote:Sturps wrote:Did you publicly claim that you were going to wait and investigate again?
And to add onto this, if you were just going to investigate him again, why bring up him being potentially Framed in the first place?
The first time you did this was before you claimed Invest.
Who is to say they won't frame him again?
You should have just kept quiet.
pretzellover33 wrote:Sturps wrote:Sturps wrote:Did you publicly claim that you were going to wait and investigate again?
And to add onto this, if you were just going to investigate him again, why bring up him being potentially Framed in the first place?
The first time you did this was before you claimed Invest.
Who is to say they won't frame him again?
You should have just kept quiet.
I thought it would make me more suspicious to not reveal my results.
I did not publicly claim I was going to investigate again; mindplay with a potential framer is fun.
Alzar wrote:there is no such thing as a meta, forum mafia is a lie, we are products of a confused society
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 68 guests