kosmo16 wrote:Checked Fen's ISO. We should lynch him.
why
Moderators: Varanus, FM Game Moderators
kosmo16 wrote:Checked Fen's ISO. We should lynch him.
Arcthurus wrote:i looked through fens (and sabers) iso and i think theyre fine tbh
theres nothing that particularly jumps at me as scummy and i can kind of understand their d1 progression
they reasoned out why ezras comments and behavior early on made sense from their pov and did the same for royee hence why they stayed away from those two wagons as the day went on -- both things are opposite to what saber did, so theres already a dissonance between his play and the "mafia" play
i think their kmenx push was consistent even if hyperspecifically based on one thing, which was kmenx supposedly taking the "50/50" comment too far to frame royee -- which i can understand fen doing because it was a weird comment that took me a lot to understand too and he prolly thought it was easy to twist royees words, either way i understand where he comes from
when it came to the kosmo/saber wagons he claimed both were a null but specified that kosmo felt townier to him with the responses -- im not entirely sure how to interpret this but its not exactly the best way to prevent your scumbuddy from being lynched
theres probably something to be said about saber first mentioning fen when giving their poe "ezra/royee/fen but im willing to drop fen" and then at eod going "id be willing to cfd to fen" (then "nvm the cfd to fen is bad" though fen only had one vote when saber said that so shrug) -- im not sure what that something to be said is but i think it leans more town than not?
tl;dr not really an impressive wagon, two stars
deathofrats0808 wrote:James wrote:DEATH! I JUST WANT ONE MORE BREATH!
CAAN YOOOU GRANT MEE ONE MOOOORE PLEEEEEEEEAAASE!?
All out of breath I'm afraid. I only have existential dread left.
Fenraiser wrote:Ive been legitimately busy due to work and some personal issues but I am off tomorrow so I'll answer you beautiful pmonsters then (I am okay, just busy).
Turfgrass wrote:Fenraiser wrote:Ive been legitimately busy due to work and some personal issues but I am off tomorrow so I'll answer you beautiful pmonsters then (I am okay, just busy).
Inactivity is mostly why, I just wanted him to talk to me
Miss u fen <3
Arcthurus wrote:WCS for us thats a 4v2 (mylo) by d5
Turfgrass wrote:Arcthurus wrote:WCS for us thats a 4v2 (mylo) by d5
What does this mean?
Player | Votes | Voters |
---|---|---|
# | Votes Until Majority |
Varanus wrote:I sure do love how we're going to have a game state that doesn't change until 2 hours before EoD when some shitters attempt to save watchme from being lynched
Well they don't have to claim hereArcthurus wrote:UzayAltay wrote:Arcthurus wrote:i think in this situation a smart vig keeps quiet and doesnt put their neck out there to cc someone who should be very clearly scum
You mean a smart vig that dont know anything about calculations as a smart vig who know some about calculations cc immedieatly.
the real vig doesnt HAVE to claim here though
or at least imo they shouldnt have to
watchme1 wrote:So apprently if you're the only person who claims vig in a rolelist where a vigi is guaranteed to roll then you're scum
amazing
great
insane
I'm just baffled that people can be this stubborn about someone being scum.
That isnt how it works in any conditionChubbyMooshroom9 wrote:Arcthurus wrote:i dont need the real vig to step up and counterclaim watchme to know theyre scum
its that simple
or you just wait until night 3 for
a)real vig to shoot watchme
b)watchme to shoot someone they said they would
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 58 guests