SparkingJayYT wrote:murat1996 wrote:/vote Uzay
I don't see why we don't lynch this
Fair.
I am quite the fair man as of late, but in any case I may stay there until further notice
Moderators: Varanus, FM Game Moderators
SparkingJayYT wrote:murat1996 wrote:/vote Uzay
I don't see why we don't lynch this
Fair.
SparkingJayYT wrote:So far, I am liking Reidak trying to get the ball rolling especially this early on.
murat1996 wrote:SparkingJayYT wrote:murat1996 wrote:Tp/Lo on me
I swear...
Elusive would be proud
Unlike him, I mean it
Spoiler:
murat1996 wrote:SparkingJayYT wrote:So far, I am liking Reidak trying to get the ball rolling especially this early on.
Honestly, I'm not sold on them yet, they still need more than what was said
SparkingJayYT wrote:murat1996 wrote:SparkingJayYT wrote:murat1996 wrote:Tp/Lo on me
I swear...
Elusive would be proud
Unlike him, I mean it
Spoiler:
Can't tell if this refers to Elusive or the TP/LO req. 2AM Brain.
Player | Votes | Voters |
---|---|---|
# | Votes Until Majority |
Reidak wrote:don't like this post, to me I don't see anything that's really suspicious regarding that wagon at this time and plus it seems really weird that you're already jumping in with a scumread really on - what exactly makes him suspicious?
murat1996 wrote:Tp/Lo on me
I swear...
SparkingJayYT wrote:How exactly can someone fuck up claiming Cit/Asc
Reidak wrote:watchme1 wrote:-snip-
It comes off as somewhat opportunistic like in terms of wanting to do something but not knowing what to do. Maybe it's my bias but that's how I see it
right, I can definitely see that. however, I'm thinking it could also just be eqsy memeing around. it is still rvs after all from the looks of it. If it were later in the day I'd probably have more to say regarding it. would still like to hear about why manatee's vote is NAI though
Chemist1422 wrote:lean scum on watchme based on ~nothing
watchme1 wrote:Chemist1422 wrote:lean scum on watchme based on ~nothing
It do be like that sometimes, haven't rolled scum in a while
James wrote:/vote UzayAltay
I think everyone should always have a vote on somebody, it should help with productivityChemist1422 wrote:hello
I think we should hypo what kind of cit we are, if cit, to minimize the chance PRs hit an ascetic
Agreed, but something tells me town will mess this up somehow, so it's probably not a great idea hereChemist1422 wrote:James wrote:Hey guys! Excited to be in my first game here!
I've played with you before tho
That's the point ^:)
unvote wrote:it's not about always having a vote on people
it's about making people take some type of stance, even if it isn't high effort
murat1996 wrote:unvote wrote:it's not about always having a vote on people
it's about making people take some type of stance, even if it isn't high effort
Voting for voting sake shouldn't happen
unvote wrote:murat1996 wrote:unvote wrote:it's not about always having a vote on people
it's about making people take some type of stance, even if it isn't high effort
Voting for voting sake shouldn't happen
so if you aren't voting anybody
you should find someone to vote, with a reason to be voting them
(✿◡‿◡)
unvote wrote:if you aren't able to find any reason to be voting for anybody, you aren't really playing the game (︶^︶)
murat1996 wrote:unvote wrote:if you aren't able to find any reason to be voting for anybody, you aren't really playing the game (︶^︶)
Not sure what this is gonna mean for later cases but we will see
Also sometimes not everyone is gonna vote for certain reasons when day ends
unvote wrote:murat1996 wrote:unvote wrote:if you aren't able to find any reason to be voting for anybody, you aren't really playing the game (︶^︶)
Not sure what this is gonna mean for later cases but we will see
Also sometimes not everyone is gonna vote for certain reasons when day ends
if you aren't voting at day end, you aren't really playing the game (✿◕‿◕✿)
Chemist1422 wrote:hello
I think we should hypo what kind of cit we are, if cit, to minimize the chance PRs hit an ascetic
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 180 guests