VFM 69 |Pick Your Poison| Game Over! (Mafia Wins!)

[SparkingJay]

Also we hypoclaim Cop D2 ez

Absolutely not this playerlist barring a few people could not and should not hypoclaim

It's not that hard

[SparkingJay]

https://www.mafiauniverse.com/forums/threads/761-2-Seers-Cops-and-Keeping-Good-Cover-%28by-Yates%29

boop

Oh I see, fair.

[ManateeDude]

Also we hypoclaim Cop D2 ez

Absolutely not this playerlist barring a few people could not and should not hypoclaim

What's your concern?

Vanilla Townies out themselves with greens on scum

It's not a problem because not cop =/= not PR here

We run the risk of outing the cop either way

[Chemist1422]

Also we hypoclaim Cop D2 ez

Absolutely not this playerlist barring a few people could not and should not hypoclaim

What's your concern?

Vanilla Townies out themselves with greens on scum

It's not a problem because not cop =/= not PR here

We run the risk of outing the cop either way

/vote Manatee

"the" cop?

[ManateeDude]

Also we hypoclaim Cop D2 ez

Absolutely not this playerlist barring a few people could not and should not hypoclaim

What's your concern?

Vanilla Townies out themselves with greens on scum

It's not a problem because not cop =/= not PR here

We run the risk of outing the cop either way

/vote Manatee

"the" cop?

sCumSlip!!111!!1

[Chemist1422]

Yeah that's exactly what I'm saying

[ManateeDude]

Your reasoning makes no sense considering we were discussing a scenario with a theoretical cop

[Chemist1422]

If you don't think this playerlist is capable of leaving decent hypos that's fine then don't

But the cop does have to soft their peek, should it exist

[Chemist1422]

Your reasoning makes no sense considering we were discussing a scenario with a theoretical cop

Reasonable

Your reaction sucks though

[ManateeDude]

If you don't think this playerlist is capable of leaving decent hypos that's fine then don't

But the cop does have to soft their peek, should it exist

Fair

Your reasoning makes no sense considering we were discussing a scenario with a theoretical cop

Reasonable

Your reaction sucks though

do you think my reaction was scum-indicative or did you just not like it?

[Chemist1422]

I think you already know the answer to that question

[ryanyb]

As the guy who is almost always in favor of hypo:
Why do we hypo
If there’s a cop just let them claim their check in a vacuum
Its 1 shot cop. The longer it holds info the less effective it gets.

[ryanyb]

Yes the cop dies if there’s not a jk, so what
We get 2 green or 1 green 1 red

[ManateeDude]

ogey.

why should the cop not just claim their results D2?
- if scum claims cop lategame they'll be outed so it makes no sense and seems very unlikely

- if town claims cop + result we get a plethora of information.
- Two inno's/ 1 inno and a guilty
- If an inno gets killed we learn that theres no JK
- If an inno doesn't get killed we learn that there is a JK and we're basically set for the rest of the game

- if no-one claims nothing happens but we do narrow down the roles in play

[Chemist1422]

now I feel silly for trying to big brain this

[ryanyb]

If a cop wants to hold their check to n2 that’s fine
But hypo just seems dumb

[ManateeDude]

Also we have two NKs directed at non-PRs effectively allowing them to solve if JK isnt in play (assuming cop doesnt check a PR)

[ejjinami]

oh, this started
SWEET

[ryanyb]

Also we have two NKs directed at non-PRs effectively allowing them to solve if JK isnt in play (assuming cop doesnt check a PR)

I don’t follow

[ejjinami]

I haven’t played FM for at least a few months
hahahahaha, I missed this so damn much xD

[ryanyb]

Meanwhile chemist goes and cries in a corner

[ManateeDude]

Also we have two NKs directed at non-PRs effectively allowing them to solve if JK isnt in play (assuming cop doesnt check a PR)

I don’t follow

if cop claims two innos the scum will NK the two innos taking away the focus from PRs. If they do vice versa we get two innos late game

[Chemist1422]

Meanwhile chemist goes and cries in a corner

>:/

Also we have two NKs directed at non-PRs effectively allowing them to solve if JK isnt in play (assuming cop doesnt check a PR)

I don’t follow

if cop claims two innos the scum will NK the two innos taking away the focus from PRs. If they do vice versa we get two innos late game

cop is 1-shot

[ManateeDude]

Meanwhile chemist goes and cries in a corner

>:/

Also we have two NKs directed at non-PRs effectively allowing them to solve if JK isnt in play (assuming cop doesnt check a PR)

I don’t follow

if cop claims two innos the scum will NK the two innos taking away the focus from PRs. If they do vice versa we get two innos late game

cop is 1-shot

themselves and their inno I mean

[ManateeDude]

pagetop