Page 125 of 126

Re: VFM67 | Sharing is Caring | END

PostPosted: Wed Apr 29, 2020 11:42 pm
by UzayAltay
GG All.

Re: VFM67 | Sharing is Caring | END

PostPosted: Thu Apr 30, 2020 12:06 am
by S0me0ne23
the closest town was to winning all game was the d3 wagon, but sparking and chito were too stubborn tunneling each other instead of actually playing the game + two non-voters made it unwinnable
also the lack d5 eod vc lmao

Re: VFM67 | Sharing is Caring | END

PostPosted: Thu Apr 30, 2020 12:07 am
by S0me0ne23
like how does an uncontested main wagon that doesn't hit majority the day before lylo even happened?

Re: VFM67 | Sharing is Caring | END

PostPosted: Thu Apr 30, 2020 12:09 am
by S0me0ne23
this wasn't even a game of who was playing better, just who was throwing harder
and it was town

Re: VFM67 | Sharing is Caring | END

PostPosted: Thu Apr 30, 2020 12:27 am
by polypies73
thank you for your amazing analysis

Re: VFM67 | Sharing is Caring | END

PostPosted: Thu Apr 30, 2020 12:36 am
by ARandomDouche
S0me0ne23 wrote:this wasn't even a game of who was playing better, just who was throwing harder
and it was town

Hold on, on the behalf of the mafia as the mafia representative, we did not throw. We tried our best.

Re: VFM67 | Sharing is Caring | END

PostPosted: Thu Apr 30, 2020 12:37 am
by S0me0ne23
polypies73 wrote:thank you for your amazing analysis

I'm not wrong.
d3 was the only instance not involving town throwing
except it still did
chito got himself lynched by insisting on a bad wolfread on sparking even though it was super clear it was going to get him lynched, and wow it did
dota refused to make himself readable then acted surprised when lying all game got him lynched
idk why uzay even claimed but i guess lynching the obvious fakeclaim was good?
the movement to avoid lynching in the prs was hillarious though
desert got themselves lynched for no reason
watchme refused to do anything proactive all game even after being scumread for being a literal waffle
i already mentioned the d5 vc
dota trying to escape death by a crappy cfd d1, and after seeing how well that went, trying to do the same d2 is lul
not jailing ladd n1 is throwing
eragon and 2304 were both pretty villagery so that slot shouldn't have been lynched
especially since it was pretty clear from eragon's reaction to being wagoned in lylo that he was town

Re: VFM67 | Sharing is Caring | END

PostPosted: Thu Apr 30, 2020 12:38 am
by S0me0ne23
ARandomDouche wrote:
S0me0ne23 wrote:this wasn't even a game of who was playing better, just who was throwing harder
and it was town

Hold on, on the behalf of the mafia as the mafia representative, we did not throw. We tried our best.

uzay threw
the rest of it was just letting town self destruct

Re: VFM67 | Sharing is Caring | END

PostPosted: Thu Apr 30, 2020 12:40 am
by S0me0ne23
i like how not reading anything uzay posts and just waiting for him to out himself is becoming more and more of a legitimate strategy

Re: VFM67 | Sharing is Caring | END

PostPosted: Thu Apr 30, 2020 12:42 am
by ARandomDouche
S0me0ne23 wrote:
ARandomDouche wrote:
S0me0ne23 wrote:this wasn't even a game of who was playing better, just who was throwing harder
and it was town

Hold on, on the behalf of the mafia as the mafia representative, we did not throw. We tried our best.

uzay threw
the rest of it was just letting town self destruct

Ngl, town did collapse in on itself.

When you say threw, you mean not play optimally because that I can agree with. I mean, who the hell does?

Re: VFM67 | Sharing is Caring | END

PostPosted: Thu Apr 30, 2020 12:43 am
by ARandomDouche
S0me0ne23 wrote:i like how not reading anything uzay posts and just waiting for him to out himself is becoming more and more of a legitimate strategy

If this is the JK cc, I don't really know what he could have done. Claiming citizen would most likely kill him instantly because if there was no other CC, Sparking would be confirmed town and Uzay therefore scum.

Re: VFM67 | Sharing is Caring | END

PostPosted: Thu Apr 30, 2020 12:47 am
by S0me0ne23
ARandomDouche wrote:
S0me0ne23 wrote:i like how not reading anything uzay posts and just waiting for him to out himself is becoming more and more of a legitimate strategy

If this is the JK cc, I don't really know what he could have done. Claiming citizen would most likely kill him instantly because if there was no other CC, Sparking would be confirmed town and Uzay therefore scum.

if i were in uzay's shoes, i first would have killed the person who hypoclaimed having rb'ed me, and barring that, i would have not cc'ed and just not get lynched ez

Re: VFM67 | Sharing is Caring | END

PostPosted: Thu Apr 30, 2020 12:48 am
by S0me0ne23
like sparking's claim maybe makes uzay look bad, but either going into anti-spew mode or just not getting lynched is way better than claiming scum

Re: VFM67 | Sharing is Caring | END

PostPosted: Thu Apr 30, 2020 12:50 am
by S0me0ne23
like i don't think uzay realized that jailkeeper can't actually produce red results

Re: VFM67 | Sharing is Caring | END

PostPosted: Thu Apr 30, 2020 12:55 am
by ARandomDouche
S0me0ne23 wrote:like i don't think uzay realized that jailkeeper can't actually produce red results

JK can't, but why would scum attack Uzay, not once, but twice? Its not like scum could only attack Uzay, but they chose to attack him twice. That's a pretty unlikely story imo and although I cannot say this with 100% certainty but if I heard that as town, I would be happy to lynch him.

Re: VFM67 | Sharing is Caring | END

PostPosted: Thu Apr 30, 2020 1:02 am
by S0me0ne23
ARandomDouche wrote:
S0me0ne23 wrote:like i don't think uzay realized that jailkeeper can't actually produce red results

JK can't, but why would scum attack Uzay, not once, but twice? Its not like scum could only attack Uzay, but they chose to attack him twice. That's a pretty unlikely story imo and although I cannot say this with 100% certainty but if I heard that as town, I would be happy to lynch him.

not any more unlikely than scum attacking with the same person twice lmao
at least there's rationality behind why scum might want to attack the same person twice

Re: VFM67 | Sharing is Caring | END

PostPosted: Thu Apr 30, 2020 1:08 am
by ARandomDouche
I guess. This conversation was a good learning experience.

Re: VFM67 | Sharing is Caring | END

PostPosted: Thu Apr 30, 2020 3:08 am
by DesertStorm11
Sorry for always being trash

I was 2/3 on who I thought was evil this game tho. Definitely thought Sparking was the Mafia instead of Uzay, but I was pretty sure Crimson and ARD were the Maf

Re: VFM67 | Sharing is Caring | END

PostPosted: Thu Apr 30, 2020 3:09 am
by jucktropy
Was it worth it?

Re: VFM67 | Sharing is Caring | END

PostPosted: Thu Apr 30, 2020 3:49 am
by ARandomDouche
DesertStorm11 wrote:Sorry for always being trash

I was 2/3 on who I thought was evil this game tho. Definitely thought Sparking was the Mafia instead of Uzay, but I was pretty sure Crimson and ARD were the Maf

Finally, someone who called me by my prefered nickname. Why did you think Crimson and I were scum and didn't mention it?

Re: VFM67 | Sharing is Caring | END

PostPosted: Thu Apr 30, 2020 3:51 am
by UzayAltay
@Some0ne I dont think I threw.
Like I were already going to be lynched the moment Sparking claimed.
I would kill Sparking , if I realized Sparking softed JK. I should have realized it, but I missed.
And I realized mafia can act townier after my claim (and Manatee's misreading the situation helped me, too ) so I went from that route.
About taking the kill myself again , I thought whoever JK would think mafia will change targets so it is safe.

Re: VFM67 | Sharing is Caring | END

PostPosted: Thu Apr 30, 2020 5:36 am
by SparkingJay
zzz my reads were terrible till D4, brought it back a little but was late.

Re: VFM67 | Sharing is Caring | END

PostPosted: Thu Apr 30, 2020 5:37 am
by SparkingJay
ggwp

Re: VFM67 | Sharing is Caring | END

PostPosted: Thu Apr 30, 2020 7:33 am
by Chemist1422
isn’t jailkeeper supposed to be non-consecutive anyway

Re: VFM67 | Sharing is Caring | END

PostPosted: Thu Apr 30, 2020 8:16 am
by lemonader666
Chemist1422 wrote:isn’t jailkeeper supposed to be non-consecutive anyway

no?