Joacgroso wrote:I feel like I went from Light Yagami to Keiichi Maebara.
Joacgroso wrote:I feel like I went from Light Yagami to Keiichi Maebara.
alex1234321 wrote:If there's no trap then the NK should just get the win imo. No reason to waste the extra 2 minutes waiting for the inevitable to happen. I like to stick around when I die and I'd rather not have to wait extra time to collect my loss.
cob709 wrote:alex1234321 wrote:If there's no trap then the NK should just get the win imo. No reason to waste the extra 2 minutes waiting for the inevitable to happen. I like to stick around when I die and I'd rather not have to wait extra time to collect my loss.
But they would know there's a trap if the stalemate detector doesn't goes off, which isn't fair to the trapper and the trapee.
rDelta wrote:cob709 wrote:alex1234321 wrote:If there's no trap then the NK should just get the win imo. No reason to waste the extra 2 minutes waiting for the inevitable to happen. I like to stick around when I die and I'd rather not have to wait extra time to collect my loss.
But they would know there's a trap if the stalemate detector doesn't goes off, which isn't fair to the trapper and the trapee.
But if the stalemate detector never triggers for NK vs mafioso, the NK wouldn't know if there is a trap or not.
Joacgroso wrote:I feel like I went from Light Yagami to Keiichi Maebara.
Joacgroso wrote:Of course, there's also the option to make the trapped person automatically win instead of the NK.
Joacgroso wrote:I feel like I went from Light Yagami to Keiichi Maebara.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests