Jerme wrote:Did you message the devs about your issue and have included your username in the mails?
If not, then this could be the issue, as such thing would not magically fix itself.
Jerme wrote:@Terabellum: As you were told before - the automated response were turned off due to some issues of mailproviders having eaten it. Did you include your username in your request(s)? If so, I can check for a status.
@MIXTAR: Did you attempt to create a RP lobby in Coven, or Classic? Also: Are you using the English chatlanguage, or a different one? Same question for you: Did you try to contact the devs? When did you do so and did you include your ToS username there?
Jerme wrote:@Terabellum: As you were told before - the automated response were turned off due to some issues of mailproviders having eaten it. Did you include your username in your request(s)? If so, I can check for a status.
@MIXTAR: Did you attempt to create a RP lobby in Coven, or Classic? Also: Are you using the English chatlanguage, or a different one? Same question for you: Did you try to contact the devs? When did you do so and did you include your ToS username there?
Jerme wrote:The mail was received and he'd be getting to it soonish. Not sure if he already replied, though.
Terabellum wrote:And here I am still waiting for the soonish to finally arrive... Honestly I dont know how many emails there are but whatever the case is waiting for over a month for a password change not being able to log in in the meantime is just absurd. If you are not capable of handling the problem account by account simply make a tool so we can reset the passwords ourselves!
Terabellum wrote:And here I am still waiting for the soonish to finally arrive... Honestly I dont know how many emails there are but whatever the case is waiting for over a month for a password change not being able to log in in the meantime is just absurd. If you are not capable of handling the problem account by account simply make a tool so we can reset the passwords ourselves!
Jerme wrote:there are more that one person, but one person who is mostly tending mails and social media.
I'll give him a heads up.
Jerme wrote:Such a tool would require much coding and much testing to work properly and only for the real owner of the account instead of someone who happened to know the login. This would delay the unity port too much to be realized and is not done in a flash.
Superalex11 wrote:Apologies if I'm not supposed to post this in this type of thread, but this has to be said...Jerme wrote:Such a tool would require much coding and much testing to work properly and only for the real owner of the account instead of someone who happened to know the login. This would delay the unity port too much to be realized and is not done in a flash.
This type of response is what I make reference to when I say the people supporting BMG (admins/judges/whatever) are directly complicit in BMG's behavior and incompetence. A "contact us" form requiring login would not take "much coding". An even simpler design such as one not requiring login, but just giving players another access point for contact (and then, presumably, moving to email) would not be difficult/expensive to implement, and would benefit the players.
Defending BMG in this way, to me, just looks like you're licking their boot.
Naru2008 wrote:Superalex11 wrote:Apologies if I'm not supposed to post this in this type of thread, but this has to be said...Jerme wrote:Such a tool would require much coding and much testing to work properly and only for the real owner of the account instead of someone who happened to know the login. This would delay the unity port too much to be realized and is not done in a flash.
This type of response is what I make reference to when I say the people supporting BMG (admins/judges/whatever) are directly complicit in BMG's behavior and incompetence. A "contact us" form requiring login would not take "much coding". An even simpler design such as one not requiring login, but just giving players another access point for contact (and then, presumably, moving to email) would not be difficult/expensive to implement, and would benefit the players.
Defending BMG in this way, to me, just looks like you're licking their boot.
Hey bud, you might wanna clean your glasses.
Terabellum wrote:Naru2008 wrote:Superalex11 wrote:Apologies if I'm not supposed to post this in this type of thread, but this has to be said...Jerme wrote:Such a tool would require much coding and much testing to work properly and only for the real owner of the account instead of someone who happened to know the login. This would delay the unity port too much to be realized and is not done in a flash.
This type of response is what I make reference to when I say the people supporting BMG (admins/judges/whatever) are directly complicit in BMG's behavior and incompetence. A "contact us" form requiring login would not take "much coding". An even simpler design such as one not requiring login, but just giving players another access point for contact (and then, presumably, moving to email) would not be difficult/expensive to implement, and would benefit the players.
Defending BMG in this way, to me, just looks like you're licking their boot.
Hey bud, you might wanna clean your glasses.
I'm not so sure about that, but you guys might wanna fix your customer support.
Been a gamer for well over 17 years now, I have absolutely never had to wait so long for a simple account issue to be fixed.
Witty responses are awesome, but providing support for the game me and many others bought is also pretty alright.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests