TheWabbit wrote:polypies73 wrote:wabbit send help
what do you need help with
my brain hurts
Return to: SFM 67: Christmas Paranoia Mafia-Game Over-Christmas Saved?
TheWabbit wrote:polypies73 wrote:wabbit send help
what do you need help with
UzayAltay wrote:polypies73 wrote:you're argument has got so bad I don't knwo what you are saying anymore i'm sorry.
At VFM 62 I keep tunneling alet Because I was planning to CC them . Dont act Like You are not understanding , You were my buddy and should know that very well .
UzayAltay wrote:polypies73 wrote:UzayAltay wrote:@poly I mean at First " are You accepting everything in case , and only problem with that ? "
At second one saying " You aren't believable with an answer Like that " (especially when This answer is very close to ad hominem )
First question is stupid, i'm not accepting the case wtf where did you get that idea.
second question is also stupid, it's not believable to you, i'm sure others who aren't scum will actaulyl read what i said and consider it
Because You didnt deny it
It is very very believable when your only argument against case is " Uzay cant be town Because they are tunneling me " . I am very sure others Will think Same with You .
UzayAltay wrote:@poly I mean at First " are You accepting everything in case , and only problem with that ? "
At second one saying " You aren't believable with an answer Like that " (especially when This answer is very close to ad hominem )
UzayAltay wrote:polypies73 wrote:seriously no town tunnels someone because of ONE bad read, that basically wasn't even a read, just a slot filler.
I Like how You are answering my case .
Continue , continue , that is definitely believable .
UzayAltay wrote:polypies73 wrote:UzayAltay wrote:Poly Case
Spoiler:
get destroyed.
it's amazing you made a whole case on my read of one person.
Because that's clearly so worthy of a massive scumread.
Nice answer to The case
So You are accepting it is only problem in The case , right ? If Yes , Basicly , it is What proves You are scum , so I made A case based that.
UzayAltay wrote:Poly Case
Spoiler:
LOLingHyena wrote:/vote Wabbit
AcidicBreeze wrote:LOLingHyena wrote:AcidicBreeze wrote:what are the current ideas for today. i know theres still 48 hours or so left in the day but still
What would you like them to be?
Im not really sure. I have a few ideas on potential town but no solid scumreads
dota2reporter wrote:thats all you have to say??
dota2reporter wrote:why deny it?
have you ever seen scum respond like this to a "derpclear denied"? hell naw
dota2reporter wrote:AcidicBreeze wrote:SparkingJayYT wrote:@Acidic Derpclear denied
Not a derp clear. I can clearly see jackson softing my role.
its mainly this post
for context, acidic is saying how jackson is softing mafia vengekiller
dota2reporter wrote:why are people pushing acidic/always and not responding to my cases on them :/
Multiuniverse wrote:therealet1 wrote:no
no ones alignment is ever dependant on the other in this game specifically
False
Since scums have townpeeks
It just means that SvS arent a thing
TvS with T as S' townpeek is still possible though
Return to: SFM 67: Christmas Paranoia Mafia-Game Over-Christmas Saved?