TheWabbit wrote:wow no night results
I guess andilin targeted me
No night results PM means SP. Just so you know.
Moderators: Varanus, FM Game Moderators
TheWabbit wrote:wow no night results
I guess andilin targeted me
TheWolfBuddy wrote:you can take TPA I don't want them they never chatted.
Multiuniverse wrote:Hi I just replaced in.
What have I missed so far?
andilin1 wrote:_-_ My pychic abilities tell me that there is 1 or more scum backing UNDER. _-_
Shultz is also scummy. Bussing is old
Varanus wrote:I have god tier night checks
Multiuniverse wrote:So. This seems like a mess.
A 50 people FM.
So are we like trying to find and kill all the rebellions?
How about the other factions?
ElusiveBelle wrote:Catching up had a good chat with Obi last night so they get a town lean now that I managed to really bounce ideas off them.
We came up with the idea though and bounced it around that the tank was potentially scum driven but not lethal as it was an event and not ITA related. The shot after was something similar to a day vig if I as to assume as it did happen within the ITA time period and not part of the shot. Also bounced around the idea that everyone should check with Met come ITA just in case we have hidden text to control the good NPCs as needed so they don't go to waste. Losing Bottle whom had a lot of them isn't a good thing. Although I am curious to why they didn't use them.
We also bounced around the idea of the significance of the targets picked by the tank as FML was one every time and I don't remember the others. If it was not intended to be lethal then what purpose was there? Figuring out if it has significance could be important.
We also agreed that Jammy should be checked, the way they commented about the tank made it sketchy and came off faked, we assume if someone was controlling the tank Jammy would be a likely suspect.
Side note: Wolf, if I could get a join to your chat that would be cool beans. I kinda want to test something. And if you want someone out of your chat I can take them for a night to talk to.
JammySplodge wrote:When did we agree I should be checked I don't remember that discussion
ladd wrote:I have only read schult'z ISO to see if he claimed <3
can everybody check if the wiki of their character and tell me if their abilities are under"Personal Potentials"plz
literally every flipped town including bottle have their ablities there and most of the people implied it yesterday as well, see obi's post
I have a not a member of gallia result on you schult, are you a neutral? :] i really got a cop from the event btw it simply was not a daycop
Schultz128 wrote:Slept peacefully.ladd wrote:I am 99% sure i have a guilty on you schultz so claim plz
As i said i ll prob afk and be here for itas and/or when i feel like playing
bye
You're going to have to explain this, but whatever, I'll be gucci for a hardclaim.
Hard claiming Hubert Brixham. I am a Lanseal Professor.
My first ability is called "Blue Death", which gives my ITA shots 100% accuracy.
My second ability is called "Battle Ready", which lowers my chance of being shot via ITAs from 15% to 10%.
Dragonfire77111 wrote:Glad I survived the night, and pleased to see andilin gone, it's a bonus he was scum as well. Too bad about Bottle and the NPCs though.
Everyone who shot UNDER is basically confirmed not Rebellion, I don't see why they would risk killing a fellow scum like that. By this logic, Schultz is not Rebellion. My guess would be that he is Neutral, probably Rebellion-sided Neutral seeing as he didn't claim it.
Wolf is your guilty on Malax legit?
I believe Olly seeing as he was one of the tank's targets yesterday and I liked his reaction test. That said, any more fake guilties are just going to get annoying.
Moleland wrote:Dragonfire77111 wrote:Glad I survived the night, and pleased to see andilin gone, it's a bonus he was scum as well. Too bad about Bottle and the NPCs though.
Everyone who shot UNDER is basically confirmed not Rebellion, I don't see why they would risk killing a fellow scum like that. By this logic, Schultz is not Rebellion. My guess would be that he is Neutral, probably Rebellion-sided Neutral seeing as he didn't claim it.
Wolf is your guilty on Malax legit?
I believe Olly seeing as he was one of the tank's targets yesterday and I liked his reaction test. That said, any more fake guilties are just going to get annoying.
Is everyone who shot understood really not rebellion?
glhf3 wrote:Erravi wrote:GLHF, I've noticed that you're here and I can't recall anything you've done. Anyone you feel is scummy? Anyone you'd like to prod at a bit?
A few things feel off to me:
This Belle quote: http://blankmediagames.com/phpbb/viewto ... 6#p2163826 I mean, eventually Belle targeted a rebel NPC and hit but even if the odds are lower, they're not zero so I was unsure about the hesitation there. Most of the shots on the NPCs missed but Belle's hit so I'm not sure if I buy the reduced accuracy claim.
Mole's claim of not noticing the rebel scums seems off to me. I mean, even if you don't look back to the OP, you still see players posting "shoot rebel scum". Also, he dodged 3-4 shots without taking cover? I mean, sure, if none of the shooters got an ITA boost then that'd put him still above 50% for dodging all of the shots
Schultz's claim of 100% accuracy seems bizarre to me considering flavor. The guy was kicked out of the military for an eye injury and forced to go into teaching.. Yes, he used to be an ace and with even one good eye would probably do better than the average cadet but 100%?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 152 guests