Search found 56 matches

Return to: 12E: Treacherous Temple: Game Over (Town, NB, NE Won!)

Re: 12E: Treacherous Temple: Game Over (Town, NB, NE Won!)

I kinda was prodging tbh, I didn't even really read people. All I really did was point out how things worked mechanically.
by EvilDeanius0
Tue Jul 11, 2017 10:59 pm
 
Forum: Game Threads
Topic: 12E: Treacherous Temple: Game Over (Town, NB, NE Won!)
Replies: 3859
Views: 478488

Re: 12E: Treacherous Temple, Day 6: Event-less Morning

TimeToReap wrote:
EvilDeanius0 wrote:They probably did it because if you were consort you wouldn't have been able to attack.

Consorts are immune to roleblocks tho i thought.

Only while roleblocking. If they perform the kill instead, they can be blocked.
by EvilDeanius0
Mon Jul 10, 2017 12:09 am
 
Forum: Game Threads
Topic: 12E: Treacherous Temple: Game Over (Town, NB, NE Won!)
Replies: 3859
Views: 478488

Re: 12E: Treacherous Temple, Day 6: Event-less Morning

They probably did it because if you were consort you wouldn't have been able to attack.
by EvilDeanius0
Sun Jul 09, 2017 11:43 pm
 
Forum: Game Threads
Topic: 12E: Treacherous Temple: Game Over (Town, NB, NE Won!)
Replies: 3859
Views: 478488

Re: 12E: Treacherous Temple, Day 6: Event-less Morning

Blackmailer contacted me again yesterday btw but it wasn't really worth mentioning. Basically asked me if I could side with them, I replied that I had no idea who they were and couldn't really help. He did say his teammate didn't want to work with me, but whether or not that was another situation where they were trying to frame TD or not is the same as the whole Snap scenario so I didn't think to bring it up.
by EvilDeanius0
Sun Jul 09, 2017 11:07 pm
 
Forum: Game Threads
Topic: 12E: Treacherous Temple: Game Over (Town, NB, NE Won!)
Replies: 3859
Views: 478488

Re: 12E: Treacherous Temple, Day 6: Event-less Morning

Slept peacefully.
by EvilDeanius0
Sun Jul 09, 2017 11:00 pm
 
Forum: Game Threads
Topic: 12E: Treacherous Temple: Game Over (Town, NB, NE Won!)
Replies: 3859
Views: 478488

Re: 12E: Treacherous Temple, Day 5: Quite the Mess

PurpleSidewalk1 wrote:@EvilDeanius I'm sorry I said we might lynch you that was foolish of me, I have just realized you are a confirmed neutral and thus we will never lynch you <3


I didn't even realize I was confirmed.
by EvilDeanius0
Fri Jul 07, 2017 1:10 pm
 
Forum: Game Threads
Topic: 12E: Treacherous Temple: Game Over (Town, NB, NE Won!)
Replies: 3859
Views: 478488

Re: 12E: Treacherous Temple, Day 5: Quite the Mess

PurpleSidewalk1 wrote:
EvilDeanius0 wrote:Oops, sorry I'm tired.

Under and Macca may be the same alignment from these results, it just means they're different alignments from Purple. Could easily be Town,Maf,Town or Maf,Town,Maf.

Yes because Under and I are both mafia who would push the lynch of our own mafia for an entire day (twice for me)

My point is there is not necessarily one of every alignment in that group.
by EvilDeanius0
Thu Jul 06, 2017 10:33 pm
 
Forum: Game Threads
Topic: 12E: Treacherous Temple: Game Over (Town, NB, NE Won!)
Replies: 3859
Views: 478488

Re: 12E: Treacherous Temple, Day 5: Quite the Mess

Oops, sorry I'm tired.

Under and Macca may be the same alignment from these results, it just means they're different alignments from Purple. Could easily be Town,Maf,Town or Maf,Town,Maf.
by EvilDeanius0
Thu Jul 06, 2017 10:21 pm
 
Forum: Game Threads
Topic: 12E: Treacherous Temple: Game Over (Town, NB, NE Won!)
Replies: 3859
Views: 478488

Re: 12E: Treacherous Temple, Day 5: Quite the Mess

PurpleSidewalk1 wrote:
mdb1023 wrote:Wait, can someone explain the PC results and also how PC works again? I'm a bit confused.

PC checks one person each night, they compare the target of N2 to the target of N1 and get a result that says "same" or "different" meaning the two people have the same or different alignments.

For example (this is what happened in this game), Olly claims to be PC and to have done these actions:
N1 - Under (mdb)
N2 - Purple - different
N3 - Macca - different

So if Olly is town then you and I are different alignments; Macca and I would also be different alignments. Alignments being Mafia, Town, Neutral.


When I say mdb, Purple, and Macca are all different alignments if Olly is town, but mdb and Purple are basically eliminated as mafia, this means that Macca must be mafia and one of us must be neutral. However, I don't think either you are scum at all, and I am not scum, therefore Olly is mafia pulling some gambit. When Olly revealed his results we were one mislynch from MyLo, had we believed Olly the lynches would have been Under then me and we would both flip town and mafia would win.
by EvilDeanius0
Thu Jul 06, 2017 10:20 pm
 
Forum: Game Threads
Topic: 12E: Treacherous Temple: Game Over (Town, NB, NE Won!)
Replies: 3859
Views: 478488

Re: 12E: Treacherous Temple, Day 5: Quite the Mess

Should I save my "Why would a Stalker kill me" rant for post-game or now?

SP.
by EvilDeanius0
Thu Jul 06, 2017 2:50 pm
 
Forum: Game Threads
Topic: 12E: Treacherous Temple: Game Over (Town, NB, NE Won!)
Replies: 3859
Views: 478488

Re: 12E: Treacherous Temple, Day 4: Amurica Day

/vote Andilin

Two jesters and a survivor in a game? Nah.
by EvilDeanius0
Tue Jul 04, 2017 2:24 pm
 
Forum: Game Threads
Topic: 12E: Treacherous Temple: Game Over (Town, NB, NE Won!)
Replies: 3859
Views: 478488

Re: 12E: Treacherous Temple, Night 3: JammySplat

Roleblocked. Under and Jacko cleared of stalker then.
by EvilDeanius0
Mon Jul 03, 2017 11:14 pm
 
Forum: Game Threads
Topic: 12E: Treacherous Temple: Game Over (Town, NB, NE Won!)
Replies: 3859
Views: 478488

Re: 12E: Treacherous Temple, Day 3: Two for the Price of One

D1 - stalked
N1
D2
N2
D3 - Killed

Actions are processed at the end of the day, so the kill would happen at the end of the day.
by EvilDeanius0
Sat Jul 01, 2017 3:51 pm
 
Forum: Game Threads
Topic: 12E: Treacherous Temple: Game Over (Town, NB, NE Won!)
Replies: 3859
Views: 478488

Re: 12E: Treacherous Temple, Day 3: Two for the Price of One

QuantumRadius wrote:
chitownmvp01 wrote:
QuantumRadius wrote:hey so jammy is mafia for sure now, but id rather take out understood and roleblock jammy

The NK!Under thing self resolves tonight. Please stop.

i can't roleblock jammy if I die before the night phase

You can only die before the night phase if a stalker targeted you D1, I don't think that's likely to have happened before your claim.
by EvilDeanius0
Sat Jul 01, 2017 3:23 pm
 
Forum: Game Threads
Topic: 12E: Treacherous Temple: Game Over (Town, NB, NE Won!)
Replies: 3859
Views: 478488

Re: 12E: Treacherous Temple, Day 3: Two for the Price of One

There not being a stalker death doesn't even mean there may not be one, it is possible for the stalker to have switched some of his stalks onto other targets.
by EvilDeanius0
Fri Jun 30, 2017 11:45 pm
 
Forum: Game Threads
Topic: 12E: Treacherous Temple: Game Over (Town, NB, NE Won!)
Replies: 3859
Views: 478488

Re: 12E: Treacherous Temple, Day 3: Two for the Price of One

ShortcutButton wrote:No more inactivity guys!!!! >:(((

Gooooo

Do shit

But my freelo.

Having an extra night to get more info from oily could be helpful here, it would also let us see if stalker kills are going to happen today or during the night.
by EvilDeanius0
Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:38 am
 
Forum: Game Threads
Topic: 12E: Treacherous Temple: Game Over (Town, NB, NE Won!)
Replies: 3859
Views: 478488

Re: 12E: Treacherous Temple, Day 3: Two for the Price of One

JammySplodge wrote:at this point I want to lynch Under no matter who has what result on anyone

No, he is my shepherd this game.
by EvilDeanius0
Thu Jun 29, 2017 11:20 am
 
Forum: Game Threads
Topic: 12E: Treacherous Temple: Game Over (Town, NB, NE Won!)
Replies: 3859
Views: 478488

Re: 12E: Treacherous Temple, Day 3: Two for the Price of One

I'd side with town until its impossible for me to win by doing so.
by EvilDeanius0
Wed Jun 28, 2017 10:46 pm
 
Forum: Game Threads
Topic: 12E: Treacherous Temple: Game Over (Town, NB, NE Won!)
Replies: 3859
Views: 478488

Re: 12E: Treacherous Temple, Day 3: Two for the Price of One

I believe Olly the least of these 3 even without them claiming tbh.
by EvilDeanius0
Wed Jun 28, 2017 10:43 pm
 
Forum: Game Threads
Topic: 12E: Treacherous Temple: Game Over (Town, NB, NE Won!)
Replies: 3859
Views: 478488

Re: 12E: Treacherous Temple, Day 3: Two for the Price of One

Kinda echoing what's already been said but the second RB in a row does seem to indicate Consort over Escort. And if the mafia believed Jacko was the NK, they'd let him get kills before lynching him, they'd need the town deaths. Possibility of him faking RBed is still possible, depends on what you make of Leyva being able to confirm it immediately after replacing in.
by EvilDeanius0
Tue Jun 27, 2017 11:08 pm
 
Forum: Game Threads
Topic: 12E: Treacherous Temple: Game Over (Town, NB, NE Won!)
Replies: 3859
Views: 478488

Re: 12E: Treacherous Temple, Night 2: Shock and Awesome

SP.

NK has to be either stalker or Jacko at this point. I can't see a 20p game with no NK. First stalker death would be the end of today unless the stalker switched targets.
by EvilDeanius0
Tue Jun 27, 2017 9:53 am
 
Forum: Game Threads
Topic: 12E: Treacherous Temple: Game Over (Town, NB, NE Won!)
Replies: 3859
Views: 478488

Re: 12E: Treacherous Temple, Day 2: Harper Reed in his Chest

JackoDerp wrote:Understood claimed TK right

Theres really not enough evidence to assume Under is the NK Quantum, please stop treating it like its confirmed

Not you too, Jacko.
by EvilDeanius0
Sat Jun 24, 2017 1:52 pm
 
Forum: Game Threads
Topic: 12E: Treacherous Temple: Game Over (Town, NB, NE Won!)
Replies: 3859
Views: 478488

Re: 12E: Treacherous Temple, Day 2: Harper Reed in his Chest

Anither possibility is that mafia is hiding a det charge. I've seen it happen before, otherwise it can be easy to avoid two det targets visiting each other. Maf hiding it might allow them to control the kills.
by EvilDeanius0
Sat Jun 24, 2017 1:24 pm
 
Forum: Game Threads
Topic: 12E: Treacherous Temple: Game Over (Town, NB, NE Won!)
Replies: 3859
Views: 478488
Next

Return to: 12E: Treacherous Temple: Game Over (Town, NB, NE Won!)